Module 3 Reflection

This conference, students discussed aspects of distance education and face-to-face courses and role of instructors. Here are my thoughts…

Aspects of Distance Education

Bates & Poole (2003) state “a systems approach to instructional design has proved particularly powerful for technology-based teaching but requires substantial resources and reflects a more teacher-centered approach to learning” (p. 153). Using the systems approach in distance education courses can be valuable to any collegiate institution. Defining roles and responsibilities of faculty, staff, and administrators is an important key to the success of the program. Courses must be planned and evaluated for performance and content must be clearly outlined for student learning. There are many guidelines to consider for course developers when a “study guide” is created (Moore & Kearsley, 2005, p. 108). The study guide is used to communicate teaching ideas and give students the structure that is needed for a coherent course. Student participation and anatomy is a critical factor and should be considered when designing a course. In order for student learning to take place, students must participate and receive feedback from peers and teacher. The emotional bond created between teacher and students will lead to a successful program.

Role of instructors

There is a difference in the role of distance education and face-to-face instructors which can be considered a challenge for educational institutions. DE instructors must assess student learning by using educational tools such as blogs, online journals, and discussion threads to monitor and evaluate the success of the student. On the other hand, face-to-face instructors can evaluate students in the classroom by facial expressions and comments made during class discussions. DE instructors must have extensive training to use the technology equipment and be able to implement the course in an online format while face-to-face instructors need minimum technology training. Moore & Kearsley (2005) state that instructors must meet certain obligations or “functions” and be “empathetic, with an ability to sense their students' personalities” (p. 136-37). This is a difficult task but one that is necessary for a well-structured course. Face-to-face instructors have a visual of student reactions therefore, know when students understand. In my opinion, DE instructors are more than “teachers” they are now developing courses and guiding student learning.

References:

Bates, A.W., & Poole, G. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education: Foundations for success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.) . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.